Pascal’s Wager
An argument set out by Blaise Pascal in his Pensées (1670). If God exists, and one commits oneself to a life of faith, the rewards in Heaven will be infinitely greater than any benefit one would get in life by not committing oneself to a life of faith (perhaps a bit of extra time for gardening on a Sunday morning?). Therefore, assuming that he does exist and committing oneself to a life of faith is a good bet. It would only be a bad bet if we knew for certain that God does not exist, which we don’t.P14
The Wager is a version of the Precautionary Principle, but it is less vague, and it is a reasonable approach to risk in a constructive argument with (say) sceptics on climate change. If a breakdown of the present climate equilibrium—an event of infinitely high cost—were no more than a minor possibility, it would still be rational to take action, even expensive action, to try to prevent it. You do not at all have to be certain that climate change is real to justify doing something about it.
« Back to List of Entries