Living Standards
Lean Logic makes a distinction between “nominal” and “real” living standards. Nominal living standards tend to be measured in terms of monetary income and productivity. Real living standards are not. For example, feeling safe in our homes counts as a positive aspect of real living standards, but security gates and electronic systems bought in order to feel safe do not. They are (at best) regrettable necessities. The transport that has brought these tomatoes to my table is a regrettable necessity, but no one would claim that the transport itself improved the quality of the tomatoes.
Nonetheless, such intermediate goods—the things a household needs to buy, directly or indirectly, in order to enjoy the things it wants—do tend to get counted-in to measures of living standards, and they shouldn’t. They are a positive contribution to Gross Domestic Product (GDP), but they are only repairs to, and compensations for, the intensification needed by a super-large economy, all of which GDP faithfully measures.
In other words, real living standards cannot be measured in money. When, or if, the informal economy of the future is well-developed, real living standards will be high, though purchases of goods and services will be low. GDP will be history.L201
Related entries:
Well-Being, Dollar-a-Day Fallacy.
« Back to List of Entries