Sunk Cost Fallacy, The
The fallacy that, when a choice is being made between two or more alternatives, the costs that have already been incurred in bringing the alternatives to their present stage should be taken into account. In fact, only the costs and benefits expected in the future should be counted.
This can be hard: if millions have already been spent on developing alternative A, but alternative B is in fact better, simpler and (in terms of future costs) cheaper, then this is a matter of regret and embarrassment. It should prompt a kaikaku moment, but the people who have built their careers in developing alternative A can be expected to argue against with passionate intensity: “We cannot just throw 20 years’ work down the drain. . .”.
In fact, decisions can only affect the future, so only future costs and benefits should be considered.
Related entries:
Paradigm, Nuclear Energy, TEQs (Tradable Energy Quotas), Time Fallacies.
« Back to List of Entries